A substantial benefit of human cloning is that with new technological knowledge, scientists are discovering means to generate entire separate organs and other tissues such as nerve and heart muscle cells without the creation of an entire person. At present, there is a great shortage of organs on hand for transplants, and persistent study in cloning of this nature may well eliminate this dilemma. According to an article in Scientific American:

Once we are able to drive nerve cells from cloned embryos, we hope not only to heal damaged spinal cords

The foremost argument that resistors have in opposition to human cloning is the belief that it is a means of "playing God". They believe that only God can create a human being, and that the cloned individual will not be "natural". In a sense, they are saying that the clone would not be a "real" person. This notion is nonsensical. A human clone is a human being, just the same as a person born naturally. Because there are many benefits to human cloning and since not everyone believes in a god, why should religious conviction be exercised in making decisions for people where religious morality is not an issue? In reality doctors "play God" on a daily basis by saving lives. Women take birth control pills to prevent pregnancy. It is commonly accepted that scientists create babies in test tubes. With these facts presented, it is clear that cloning should not only be officially authorized, but also recognized and supported as a true scie

Some common words found in the essay are:
Cleveland Ohio, Scientific American, , human cloning, benefit human, benefit human cloning, opposition human cloning, opposition human, create babies,
Approximate Word count = 630
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)