Many say that the Bush Administration is justified in its attempts to wage war against Iraq. Citizens that believe in this course of action should stop and examine some of the finer details. After the conflict in Afghanistan our government shifted its attention to Iraq in its search for "weapons of mass destruction." Simply because Iraq has the capability to one-day produce nuclear arms is not justification for a preemptive attack from the U.S. Countries across the globe and the majority of the U.N. opposes the U.S.'s proposal of a preemptive attack on Iraq simply because the country could one day threaten freedom. Iraq has shown no signs of aggression towards the U.S. that merits military actions. Another point that was brought up a former U.N. weapons inspector was that Iraq no longer poses a threat to the U.S. in any way. If our government proceeds with its plans to invade Iraq our efforts to el
Our recent actions in the middle east have received little to no approval by our allies. If we attack Iraq our efforts to eliminate terrorism in other countries will be jeopardized due our actions angering other foreign powers. This could give rise to more anti-U.S. terrorist attacks, and could end up doing us more harm than good. With the U.S. standing virtually alone in its war against Iraq this would leave our country extremely vulnerable to other once-latent threats.
Iraq also no longer poses a serious threat to the U.S. Although reports have told of secret mobile weapons labs little to know solid evidence backs up this theory. Due to the strict economic and military sanctions place on Iraq the county's ability to become a military superpower has been all but eliminated. Also no proof of Iraqi involvement with the Taliban eliminates another one of the reasons for an attack of any sort. More efforts to solve this problem
All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009
Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA Webmasters make $$$$