act in good will of their family and not the school system's. Another topic under much debate would be assisted suicide. The Kantian view is totally opposed to this. It is just wrong to kill someone. One cannot kill another person out of good will. If you were to apply this to the Universal Law it would not hold true and there for it is wrong. On the other hand, the Utilitarian view would be open to this concept. How could we allow one to suffer knowing they are going to die in the end anyway? Would it be wrong to stop the suffering? How can one seek the greatest amount of happiness if they are suffering and are basically condemned to die? By assisting this individual we are also helping out his family by limiting their grief. We are also helping out society by freeing up a bed in the hospital for those individuals that could be healed and go on to lead a happy life. It could also save money if the person does not have insurance. The last example I want to use is the

Some common words found in the essay are:
AIDS Utilitarian, Universal Law, Kantian Utilitarian, HIV AIDS, kantian view, utilitarian view, Judgement Kant, kantian view favor, spreading diseases hiv, view favor program, society kantian view, diseases hiv aids, breaks law, diseases hiv, spreading diseases, hiv aids, burden society, program considering, view favor, drug users,
Approximate Word count = 655
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)