99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

Miranda Decision

This infamous Supreme Court case of 1966 deals with the rights of the accused, mainly with the Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate one's self. Ernest Miranda, a Mexican-American in his mid twenties at the time, was living in Phoenix working for a produce company when he was accused of raping and kidnapping an eighteen year old woman. At the time, rape was one of the most popular crimes in Phoenix, and because the woman's description of her attacker fit Miranda's profile, he was arrested by Arizona police in his home and immediately taken to a local police station. Once there, Miranda was taken to an interrogation room, where he was questioned about the crimes. At first, Miranda pleaded his innocence, but after two hours of questioning, the police emerged from the room with a written and signed confession. At his trial, the written confession was admitted into evidence and Miranda was found guilty of the crime.

The United States Supreme Court was then faced with Miranda's claim that the confession was self-incriminating and violated his Constitutional rights. The police admitted that at no time, either before or after


questioning whenever they wish to do so is met. The police can also act upon volunteered statements, even if the volunteer has been taken into custody and has no knowledge of their rights. Therefore, it can be assumed that custody alone does not require the reading of the Miranda warnings. The ruling permits the police to give the warnings and obtain waivers without the use of an impartial witness or a tape recording of the events.

the questioning had Miranda been informed of his right to consult an attorney before answering any questions, or his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. The Supreme Court's job was to

determine whether or not Miranda's Constitutional rights were breached. The Court ruled in favor of Miranda, 5 to 4, and stated that the questions answered during the interrogation must have been answered with the defendant's knowledge of his rights. This meant that a testimony was only legitimate if proper procedure was followed.

There are also some secondary effects of the Miranda case on police proceedings. Law does not require that a person taken into custody first consult with a

Some common words found in the essay are:
Fifth Amendment, Miranda Mexican-American, Miranda's Constitutional, Supreme Court, Supreme Court's, constitutional rights, rights police, supreme court, constitutional rights police, , waiver constitutional rights, fifth amendment, court ruled, miranda decision, admitted evidence, confession admitted evidence, confession admitted, knowledge rights, waiver constitutional,
Approximate Word count = 764
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Miranda Decision

Miranda v. Arizona1537 words
Miranda V. Arizona1536 words
Miranda vs. Arizona713 words
Miranda trial965 words
Miranda vs. Arizona3179 words

Look at even more essays on Miranda Decision
More Politics Essays

Professional Papers:
The Miranda Decision5090 words
MIRANDA V. ARIZONA This research paper discusse2707 words
How Supreme Court Justices Decide Cases2690 words
How the Supreme Court Decides Cases2709 words
Gated Communities in the US2928 words
The Personal Responsibility Act1789 words
Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers