Cloning
The topic of cloning has been in many debates. It is a very controversial issue, with many different and assorted viewpoints. While some find the procedures and actions concerning cloning acceptable; others object it on a basis of saying it is depraved and immoral. Many of those who raise objections are those who find it inappropriate for religious reasons. In both cases, a significant concern is the possibility of abuse of this inexperienced knowledge. One of the inordinate questions is, "Where will all of this stop?" It may start by just experimenting and studying, but then what comes next? Will it become status quo to start producing human bodies for spare parts? Or will those created "individuals" be actual people in society? Who can honestly say? No one can be sure exactly where all of this cloning leads, or where it will exactly stop. To evaluate the foundation of this subject, and to make a proper stance on the issue, both sides of the matter must be discussed. Those individuals, who are pro-cloning, speak of the benefits of it. One of the major benefits of cloning technology is in the improvement in the field of fertility. In studies today, in vitro fertilization only has a success rate of about 10%
There are many other conflicting opinions on the subject of cloning. Opponents say that a clone would have no individuality, that all of those "people" would be nothing more than a highly made "carbon copy." Will these clones have a birth certificate, and who will be the parents? Whose duty will it be to train these new "children" once they've been created? There is a great deal of questions still to be analyzed and considered in this. Although, supporters argue that clones would have different personalities that were shaped by their environments and experiences. Once more, as stated in the beginning, "no one can be sure." In perspective, it can be see that there are many advantages to continuing experimentation in the field of human cloning. Advances in fertility could offer hope to people who are too old to conceive or who are unable to do so with in vitro fertilization. If applied to organ transplant procedures, this new technology could save thousands of lives every year. Yet, despite the presently seen advantages, the possible effects and moral considerations are too heavy for us to continue exploring and meddling in cloning. Charles Darwin once said, "survival of the fittest", not survival of the fittest with extra help from science and genetics. The human race has made it this far without cloning, and we all as a people, as natural people, will continue to survive without it. By choosing not to clone; this is th
Some common words found in the essay are:
Cloning Debate, Judaism Christianity, Richard Seed, Law Baltimore, Charles Darwin, Anees Islamic, bone marrow, exactly stop, human cloning, organ transplant, people conceive, doctors clone, survival fittest, success rate, vitro fertilization, field fertility,
Approximate Word count = 964
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
