Justification In Belief
Does Ones Belief Require Evidence For Others? No one individual, or group of individuals for that matter, can provide a visual stimulation or a physically felt piece of evidence to give grounds for the claim of God’s existence. Many occurrences or sights can be “interpreted” to be the work of the Lord but in the definition alone lays the word “individual” and therefore cannot be considered proof for everyone. The understanding that everyone will not concur on an individual’s experience as evidence sets up the boundaries for disagreement between societies so that each can be compared to the other for their own conditions. In the Scientific realms of life the case has little question. Is there measurable evidence that such a being exists? Many say there is and use the “unexplainable” occurrences as the evidence for support. The Scientific Method however, depends upon something being “known” to begin with and without the actual evidence of God existing cannot support the case. In the pursuit of science, many things hold contrary evidence to the existence of God have come to pass. The evolution of animals, the carbon dating of the earth and cosmological happenings all provide discredit for a “Supreme Being's” existenc
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Karl Marx, Supreme Deity, Father Heaven, Require Evidence, Supreme Being's, Scientific Method, Belt America, Karl Marxs, Epic Gilgamesh, Hebrew Bible, physical evidence, individual raised, physical evidence provided, evidence provided, evidence existence, lack physical, supreme deity, gods existence, bible evidence, day life, beliefs god, lack physical evidence,
Approximate Word count = 1063
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
