99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

Museum Paper

The piece I have chosen is an oil painting by Chuck Close entitled Robert, made in 1997. I observed it at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA). The painting, which measures an enormous 102 by 84 inches, is a straightforward portrait of one of Close's friends and fellow (pop) artists Robert Rauschenberg, although its dazzling style and ingenious execution are anything but straightforward.

The subject matter is typical of Chuck Close: a large, frontal view of a person's head. The technique of the piece reflects Close's later style, where the painting is divided into a diagonal grid in which each square contains an assortment of painted geometric shapes, ranging widely in colors, many of which, curiously enough, are not even normally found on the human face (green, violet, blue, etc.). However, when observed from a distance, the many separate squares and the varying shapes and colors within them seem to merge together to form a complete, convincing human face. The individual conflicting colors disappear and, oddly enough, the familiar pigments and features of the human face are readily visible. Like most of his portraits, Chuck Close shows his subject from a close, disorienting vantagepoint. Robert Rauschenberg's grinni


Stylistically, Seurat and Close's paintings harmonize to the same artistic melody. Seurat's time-consuming technique of "pointillism" (also referred to as "divisionism") was employed in order to create purer, richer, more vibrant colors in his paintings. According to the physics of light, primary colors can be combined to form secondary colors (blue + yellow = green, for example). However, the same principles do not relate to pigments of paint, which are not the pure essences of colors they appear to be (blue and yellow paint do not make as vibrant a green as one might assume they would). Seurat attempted to overcome this limitation by using unmixed, pure colors in La Grande Jatte. Instead of mixing two colors and then applying them to the canvas, he applied the pure colors onto the canvas as tiny dots in close proximity to one another, trusting that the two colors would form their intended offspring when viewed from a distance of a few feet. This technique yielded partial success; the dots of paint are still visible, but the colors are indeed bright and lively.

The face in Robert was not painted in the typical way most artist would paint a face - that is, namely, by painting specific details like the shape of the head, the eyes, the nose, mouth, etc. Instead, the canvas was divided into thousands of squares, each mere inches across. Close paints a background color for each square from top to bottom, ranging from deep reds and blues to light yellows and greens. He then starts again at the top, painting in each square an array of loose shapes like squares, circles, diamonds, lozenges, etc., in the same range of vivid colors. When the long process is complete, a realistic-looking, vibrant face looks back at the viewer from the canvas. Close is not actually painting the parts of a face, but simply small areas of colors on a vast surface. Standing inches away from the canvas, it is impossible to discern any of the details that seem so obvious from a few feet away.

And much like the Impressionists of the previous century, Chuck Close seems to have a certain fascination with how light and color interact (across human flesh, in particular), and how these interactions can be represented with pigments of paint. La Grande Jatte and Robert both represent the respective artists' attention to detail concerning the fickle characteristics of how light plays across the surface of the subject matter. Specific areas of the left sides of Robert Rauschenberg's face show an obvious source of light; areas of shadows on the opposite further confirm this. Likewise, all the shadows in Seurat's painting have a common orientation, and we can easily tell where the sun would be within the piece. Indeed, if Chuck Close had painted Robert an hour later or earlier than he did, then it would no doubt look substantially different (actually, the fact that Close has captured such a specific moment in relation to lighting is a direct cause of the fact that the painting was based from a photograph; instead of painting rapidly to "capture the moment" in the manner that the Impressionists often did, he used the camera to automatically record the intricacies of light).

To look upon a Chuck Close painting is to fully understand that the whole is so much more than the sum of its parts. There is an unmistakable grandness to Close's portraits - not only in their

Some common words found in the essay are:
Chuck Close, Robert Rauschenberg, Grande Jatte, Robert Rauschenberg's, Seurat Close's, Jatte Instead, Grande Jatte's, Whereas Seurat's, Robert Close, Jatte Robert, chuck close, la grande, la grande jatte, grande jatte, subject matter, robert rauschenberg, frontal view, loose shapes squares, seurat's painting, robert rauschenberg's, squares circles, pigments paint, squares circles diamonds, shapes squares circles, square array loose,
Approximate Word count = 2257
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Museum Paper

Art History Museum paper981 words
Art Appreciation1890 words
College Research Paper944 words
Metropolitan Museum of Art1354 words
Rosicrucian Museum Evaluation792 words

Look at even more essays on Museum Paper
More Arts Essays

Professional Papers:
The Glass Pyramid of the Louvre Museum This paper will be ...4560 words
LIBRARY THEFT This research paper examines the1825 words
Army Signal Corps: This 8page paper provides an overview of the ...2346 words
FlatbushMidwood area of Brooklyn The purpose of this paper is to ...3940 words
anthropology956 words
The purpose of anthropology956 words
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers