12 Angry Men
12 Angry Men Group Case, Groups & Teams Section In the film, 12 Angry Men, the jurors or the group demonstrated unmistakably how teams effectively interact, or work together to perform a common task. As the group developed through the film, they clearly exhibit the stages of group development. The trial exemplifies the pre-stage and then jury deliberation. When the first vote was called for, the group came to an eleven to one vote this was the forming stage. Henry Fonda does not truly believe the defendant to be innocent, however, he correctly remarks that the case for the defense may be more believable. The rest of the jury believes that the boy is guilty. From this difference in opinion, reasons for both possibilities are discussed. This discussion is the storming stage where ideas and inputs are questioned in no particular order or organized manner. Fonda would like to simply be absolutely certain that the boy is not guilty before they make a final decision. During the norming stage, Fonda becomes the leader. One by one, he convinces the rest of the jurors that there is reasonab
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Henry Fonda, Teams Section, Garage Owner, Screaming Whats, raise hands, rest jury, favor guilty, 12 angry, , changed vote, vote guilty, boy guilty, conformity issues, convict defendant, vote called,
Approximate Word count = 741
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
