Against the Death Penalty
This country is founded centuries ago on the beliefs of a God fearing society. When our laws were first coming about was the "Eye for an eye" attitude taken into consideration? Did our founding fathers look upon the senseless acts of killing another human being as being so bad that we were willing to take the life of the murderer? What happened to the rights of the murderer because they killed? Where did it state, "You killed and now you have no rights, even to live"? Does that not conflict with America's attitude "The right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"? Do we not owe it to the person to help them see the wrong in what they have done? To try to rehabilitate that person so they can become a member of society again and live a normal life? Not to be butchered like cattle and tossed away like a side of contaminated beef! Violating someone's civil rights is the number one reason the death penalty should be abolished. The Constitution of the United States empathetically states that a person who commits a crime still retains all their basic rights. Though their rights might be limited as a result of committing the crime; as in restriction of movement (Jail Time), not able to
own a firearm (Convicted Felon), or the right to vote. Nowhere will you find anything that states, "You are convicted of a crime and now you are nothing but a number. From now on you will be forgotten and forsaken". In 1948 the United Nations, without dissent, adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Declaration is a pledge among nations to promote fundamental rights as the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world. It proclaims each person's right to protection from deprivation of life, and it categorically states that no one shall be subjected to cruel or degrading punishment. In 1976 the Supreme Court decided that the death penalty was not inherently unconstitutional if procedures existed to prevent the punishment from being applied in an arbitrary manner. Only the most extreme of all manslaughter crimes should be tried under the death sentence and each person has the right to appeal to a higher court or to be able to petition for pardon of the sentence. The death penalty is the pre-meditated and cold-blooded killing of prisoners in state custody. It is the same as if a murderer was to call up his victim and tell that person that on a certain date he/she was going to kill them? What anguish and emotional trauma do you think that person would go through waiting to die? This is exactly what the state judicial system does to death penalty victims. The thought that the execution process is painless has yet to be proven. If administering 100 volts to a man's sensitive areas evokes moral condemnation, how does a state condone the administration of 2,000 volts to a human body in order to cause death? The physical pain caused by electrocution, gassing, hanging, poisoning, or shooting - the five methods of execution used in the United States - cannot be justified. Paralysis of organs, burning of flesh, asphyxiation, tearing of the spinal cord, or the explosive destruction of organs, are all the end results of each type of execution. Does this sound like a humane way to treat a person? These methods are not infallible either! In a 1990 Florida execution, a malfunctioning electric chair caused flames to shoot up six inches into the air from the condemned persons head. In 1992, in an Oklahoma execution by lethal injection, t
Some common words found in the essay are:
Supreme Court, Law McCleskey, Amnesty International, Privilege Poor, Compared Dallas, Texas Ohio, Rights Declaration, James Messer, Constitution United, Texas Georgia, death penalty, death sentence, supreme court, amnesty international, defendants white victims, civil rights, received death, life bars, district attorney, sentenced death, defendants white, defendants black victims, received death sentence,
Approximate Word count = 1536
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
