The state murdering people because of their crimes simply does not equate to

justice. It is real easy to hear about how the government is doing this wrong or

that, but the death penalty is abounded with so many injustices and faults that it's

an embarrassment to our entire due process of law. Supporters of capital

punishment subscribe to religious and ethical points of view rather than facts, and

when they do offer facts it's always the same argument: "It's a deterrent." The

death penalty is extreamly flawed, most notably it comes with a very high price tag

to an already under-funded correctional institution in America; no stable argument

has been installed to warrant it as a deterrent; and the moral decay it establishes

creates among other things a feeling of revenge and spite within society.

Many people for and against the death penalty are under the proposed belief that

capital punishment is a deterrent for crime. No study can offer a clear explanation

society. It's time to move on.

and drawn-out court appeals must be installed at the taxpayer's expense. On

second-degree murder rates head and shoulders above the other states? Of course

little to no incentive to gather all the precious materials to adequately support the

alternative of life imprisonment. False. In order to preserve due process many long

We have come a long way in society. In biblical times people were executed quite

done in Birmingham that life in prison has done in St. Paul? Deter crime,

Some common words found in the essay are:
Paul Deter, Wouldn't Capital, Death Penalty, death penalty, capital punishment, can't afford, offer death penalty, offer death, life prison, son didn't, afford lawyer, price tag, due process,
Approximate Word count = 1903
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)