Institute in Scotland produced Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, but

compelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results

in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issues

dealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning of

human beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and that

the cloning of non-human species subjects them to unethical or moral treatment for

The possible physical damage that could be done if human cloning became a reality is

obvious when one looks at the sheer loss of life that occurred before the birth of Dolly.

Less than ten percent of the initial transfers survive to be healthy creatures. Ther

1996). If those nuclei were human, "the cellular body count would look like sheer

carry non-human transgenic genes, would that alter our definitions and treatment of

(Potential Risks). In conclusion, the ethical and moral implications of cloning are such

scientists could transfer human genes into animals and vice-versa, that would heighten

savage beasts since time began. Humans in general have no problem with seeing

technology, be defined as still a chimp, a human, a subhuman, or something else? If

It is harder to convince that non-human cloning is wrong and unethical, but it is just

Some common words found in the essay are:
Institute Scotland, Opinion Price, Hans Jonas, Expert Opinion, , Logic Kluger, Commission March, Potential Risks, Gilbert Meilaender, Roslin Institute, non-human species, human cloning, human non-human, expert opinion, psychological effects, logic kluger 1997, cloning human, cloning non-human, beginning lives, human genes, sheer loss, species subjects unethical, non-human species subjects, sheer loss life, ethical moral implications,
Approximate Word count = 942
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)