There are many other oppositions or arguments about cloning. For example, the possibility of physical harm to the embryo. Opponents and supporters agree that the current time and technology is not safe enough to use on humans. Some fear that clones will have an accelerated aging process since the cell used in the cloning procedure will have been "exposed to a lifetime." Another argument is that there is a chance of psychological harms to the child that is cloned. Here opponents argue that children suffer a diminished sense of individuality and personal autonomy (http://atheism.about.com/religion/atheism/msubins_clone_humans.htm). A cloned child may feel that their future is constrained by the life path of their gene donor. Other possible outcomes of human cloning are degration of the quality of parenting and family life, and people starting to view children as objects.

When society tries to decide whether or not cloning should be legal, there are several questions that each person should ask. What are the needs and goals that this technology might serve? Is this technology the only means for addressing these goals and needs? What members of which communities have these goals and needs? Of these groups in need, who will have access to the technology and its products; for example, will it

Some common words found in the essay are:
Plan Creating, Cloning Wrong, Brave World, supporters argue, human cloning, argue children, fear cloning, in-vitro fertilization, harm embryo, human soul, religious ethical, supporting cloning, human life,
Approximate Word count = 890
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)