Descartes
French philosopher Rene Desartes's Meditation One: Concerning Those Things that Can Be Called into Doubt is a method of determining which beliefs are certain and which are doubtful. Descartes applied illusion argument, dreaming argument, and evil genius argument. In this paper, I will discuss how method of doubt supposed to work in general with examples and also why does Descartes adopts this particular method. Furthermore, I will add how method of doubt enables Descartes to achieve his goals and how he uses this particular method to accomplish his goals. Descartes' method of doubt is practically about sorting out our beliefs and keeping the only absolute beliefs, which cannot possibly be false. "...Because undermining the foundations will cause whatever has been built upon them to fall down of its own accord--I will at once attack those principles which supported everything that I once believed." Descartes is saying that because of the weak foundations the built will fall on its own sooner or later therefore, he will "at once" attack his principles. I have perfect example to use here. My Dad usually tells us what is the reason behind Pakistan's failure. When in 1947, Pakistan separated from India there were no rules made and if t
raining because I have perceptual belief that it's raining. "How often has my evening slumber persuaded me of such a customary things as these: that I am here, clothed in my dressing gown, seated at the fireplace, when in fact I am lying undressed between the blanket." In this sentence Descartes is trying to explain that many time we dream and what we dream seem very real. According to Descartes structure of the reasoning goes like this: (A) It looks to me that it's raining (B) So, I know that it's raining The dream argument casts doubt on the transition from A to B assuming that we cannot know what we can doubt. (A) It looks to me that it's raining (C) If I am dreaming then while it will look to me that it's raining when it's not really raining. So, I cannot be certain that it's raining because it could be just a dream. (p. 215) The second argument Descartes used is evil genius existence. Descartes used propositions of math because math problems as 7+5=12 or cone have three does not rely on our senses justification. Descartes used evil genius argument to prove that even a priori, beliefs whose truth or falsity can be established independently of experience could be doubtful. Maybe it's evil genius, which is tricking us and making us to believe that 3 7+5=12 or cone have three sides. Lets look at the structure of the reasoning that will help us to understand little better. (A) It looks to me that it's raining. (B) If I am being deceived by the evil genius then while it looks to me that it's raining however, it's not raining. So, I cannot be certain that it's raining because I could be just deceived by the evil genius. This example confirm that i
Some common words found in the essay are:
According Descartes, Called Doubt, it's raining, evil genius, it's raining it's, raining it's raining, raining it's, method doubt, looks it's raining, looks it's, dreaming deceived, raining deceived, , it's raining deceived, exist exist, conclusion matter, genius arguments, evil genius tricking,
Approximate Word count = 1116
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
