Pragmatism is described in the book as a method for settling philosophical disputes. It is based on the pragmatic theory of truth. This theory says that a "proposition p is true if and only if the belief that 'p is true' works" (Voices of Wisdom, 346). In order to get a better understanding of the pragmatic theory of truth, the theory is contrasted against two other theories, the correspondence theory of truth and the coherence theory of truth. James disagreed with these theories because "they present truth as a static property existing prior to and independent of human experience and investigation". James viewed truth as a constant movement of ideas, which guide human beings into more and more satisfying experiences every time.

The second story is about the people that lived in an island where a certain religion was taught which was based on other beliefs than the mainstream ones. A rumor was spread out that the people teaching this religion used some unfair method to get approval for teaching their religion to children. The rumors said that these teachers were trying to remove the children from their legal guardians and they pushed the issue up to the extent of accusing them of kidnapping. After an investigation by an appointed commission to the issue, based on the evidence presented by the accusers, it was determined that the accused was innocent. They had been accused on insufficient evidence and the accusers had no right to believe on such evidence as was before them because it was founded on passion and prejudice, according to Clifford. He also says that even if the teachers of the religion would have been found guilty, the action taken by the accusers was still wrong since they did it on the wrong grounds.

Now lets look at William James's essay, The Will to Believe. He starts by showing us his approach to making the decision between two hypotheses. He calls this decision an option. He categorizes options into three groups: 1- living or dead; 2- forced or avoidable; 3- momentous or trivial. He calls a genuine option one that is either of the forced, living, or momentous type.

First we take a look at an extract of William K. Clifford's essay where he presents us a few situations in order to clarify his point. He starts by telling us a story of a ship-owner that was providing transportation for a group of emigrants. He knew the ship was old, worn out, and didn't have the best craftsmanship. To get rid of his worries he did a complete overhaul to the boat and sent her of to sea. The boat sank and he collected the insurance money without ever telling anyone about his suspicions of the boat not being in the best of shapes. He thought he had gotten rid of any doubts by overhauling the vessel. "He had acquired his belief not by honestly earning it in patient investigation, but by stifling his doubts" (Voices of Wisdom, 348). On the last quote, what Clifford means by "his (the shipowner) belief" is his thoughts of his ship being in good sailing condition. According to Clifford, even if the boat had made it all the way, the shipowner would still be guilty because when an action is once done, it is right or wrong forever; no accidental failure of its good or evil fruits can possibly alter that. The fact that he got hi

Some common words found in the essay are:
Voices Wisdom, According Clifford, Clifford James, William Clifford, William Clifford's, William James's, William James, Ethics Belief, voices wisdom, , theory truth, beyond evidence, james tells, clifford's essay, believe beyond, believe beyond evidence, topic religion, voices wisdom 350, insufficient evidence, teaching religion, forced living, theory truth theory, voices wisdom 346, evidence support truth,
Approximate Word count = 1693
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)