It states Canada's opinion dealing with matters such as the alliance, war, and decision making with other countries involved in NATO. The book came across Canada's decision making as though Canada went along with the decisions made by other countries. Canada, NATO, and The Bomb is not a book to inform it is a history book. It addressed issues that had happened previously and stated the type of involvement Canada had in it. In most cases, a book dealing with these sensitive issues, which involved other countries, would provide the pros and cons but in

The overall writing of the book was poorly done only because the authors did not go in a chronological order. They went back and forth between governments and years example 40's to 60's, 50's to 70's, King to Trudeau, Pearson back to King etc. This was found confusing because of little knowledge on Canada's position.

This book showed NATO as being an organization that is very unorganized. It came across as though the countries involved did not respect each other's thoughts and opinions. It dwells on the mistakes made by countries for example the United States, various other European countries. It made it seem as though NATO was in conflict within each other making the organization as a whole seem incapable of compromise and the defence of anything. At many points NATO wanted to vote the United States out of the organization but this obviously never happened. At one point it was a problem "about the possibility of being dominated and ultimately overwhelmed by too close an association with the United States" (pg.30) for

Some common words found in the essay are:
NATO Bomb, United England, NATO NATO's, Keating Pratt, Pearson King, NATO Canada's, Treaty Organization, Canadian Government, Larry Pratt, Book Report, canada nato, countries involved, canada's position, book canada, canada nato bomb, nato bomb,
Approximate Word count = 697
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)