Europe and the new world
Tutorial Question: Why were the 'westerners' (Spanish, English, Portuguese's, French etc) able to displace the native people's of America with, seemingly, relative ease? Was this evidence of a superior 'civilisation'?Many believe that there is a great difference between 'westerners' and the native people of the lands they conquered. The truth is, that there is not great distinction, except in the minds of white men. 'Westerners' such as the French, Spanish, English and Portuguese have always believed in their own superiority. This confidence gave them the strength to displace the natives and also the justification for doing so. The civilized world seemed to grow, and change with new directions being mastered all the time, the 'non civilized' world seemed to stand still in a era recognized by Europeans as unprogressive and primitive. The Europeans viewed the Native Americans with mixed opinion, in many ways they despised their ignorance, while at the same time being in awe of their innocence. Despite this, leading opinion was that the native people of the new world were inferior to the Europeans and would have to become domesticated if they were to survive in the 'new world.' However
Washburn, Wilcomb E ( ed. ) 1964, The Indian and the White Man. Doubleday Company Inc, New York. Katz, Willian Loren. 1971, The Black West. Doubleday Company Inc, New York.
Some common words found in the essay are:
Native Americans, Native American, East Ship, Western Culture, Overall Vespucci, Vespucci America, English Portuguese, Portuguese's French, Greek Rome, Africa Moors, native americans, inc york, term 'civilisation', doubleday company inc, company inc, doubleday company, native people, fit definition, evidence superior, company inc york, stronger culture, confidence strength,
Approximate Word count = 1702
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)
|