Waterfront Disputes
The 1998 Waterfront Dispute was described by John Howard (the Prime Minister) as "a defining moment in Australia's industrial relations history". It represented a change in government strategy from the Labor Government's partisan stance to the Liberal Government's provocative stance. Discuss.a) the extent to which this statement reflects the change in policy accurately: and b) the extent to which this change affects the contemporary practice of employment relations. During the time period from 1996-1977 the Australian Government and NFF(national farmers Federation, consider various option to replace Maritime Time Union Association (MUA). They "glad plan" involved cooperation restructuring companies employing MUA labour in the Patrick Empire. Patrick and his legal advisor and consultants, consider various option to re-place union workers. On 7 April 1998, Patrick sacked its 1400 MUA workforce at its various location across Australia and replaces them with non-union workforce . Patrick Steverdorin (formely Strang Patrick Holdings) were backed up by Australian Liberal Government, NFF (National Farmers Federation) on other hand the Stevedores workers had the full support of MUA backed by Australian Workers Union (AWU), In
1. (http://www.workersnews.flex.com.au/wn/200398/web.html), ternational Transport Workers Federation (ITWF), coal miners. The government involvement in the company was because of two reasons; poor efficiency and low productivity by MUA workforce, compare to international standards. The abuse and breach of Australia Work Act (AWAs 1996) to employ non-union labor substituted with union labor was the central characteristics of waterfront dispute. Labor Government legislative amendment 1992 began particular changed relationship bargaining and compulsory arbitration and between collective agreements and awards further 1993 weaken the certification list by introducing the concept of the non-disadvantage test. This list ensures that award condition traded for pay raise, if there is no mistake done by an employee. Yes, the statement stated above is true, the Labor Government was in a way in favor with unions. Source tells there was close connection between Australian Labor Trade Union(ACTU). Hawke and Keating labor could not purse full deregulation the labour as business community would have liked. But they negotiated unions and ACTU and the award system towards decentralized enterprise bargaining arrangement was implemented. The 1980 also saw established decline in union membership, it directly related in weaken industrial power of labor g
Some common words found in the essay are:
Labor Government, Hawke Keating, Liberal Party's, Empire Patrick, Government NFF, Individual Bargaining, Industrial RelationAIRC, Liberal Government's, Patrick Stevedores, Federation ITWF, labor government, liberal government, waterfront dispute, employers employees, consider various option, government nff, common purpose, consider various, farmers federation, mua workforce, various option, liberal government power, liberal government nff,
Approximate Word count = 913
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|