Aristotelian
In this paper I will argue against Aristotle and hisidea that children cannot be virtuous, as we discussed in class. I will do this by giving concrete examples that a certain widespread religion believes in this virtuosity of a child. I will also use a more common example that occurs all Aristotle says that children cannot be virtuous because virtues are something that, to be acquired must be practiced over and over again. A child has not had enough practice, time or understanding of what he is doing to be considered virtuous. However, I think that there are virtuous children, and that not only "Athenian gentlemen" are virtuous, but some other people also, these including children. For my first example let us consider the religion of Tibet. These people elect a child, in fact a newborn to be in charge of their entire religion, this child is the Dali Lama. They think that this child is holy, and pure. Obviously they think that he is good, and virtuous. He has the most power in their entire religious system of beliefs. There are many many people who believe in this religion, and
context use the Christian religion to counter the Dali Lama they have been taught. (kind of like a pet learning a trick) learned what they have been taught, and took action in a there is no way to become, by Aristotle's definition totally Ask their parents though if this is they way that they view virtuous. They will will yes he is, not all 4 year olds dial into virtuous adults or not so virtuous adults or vice very young age on and is selected to lead a virtuous life.
Some common words found in the essay are:
Dali Lama, According Aristotle's, America Aristotle, Child Virtuous, virtuous activity, dali lama, child virtuous, child easily, children virtuous, considered child, born sinful, virtuous children, virtuous person, virtuous adults,
Approximate Word count = 800
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|