suffering is an integral part of every character's role. However, the

message that Dostoevsky wants to present with the main character,

Raskolnikov, is not one of the Christian idea of salvation through

suffering. Rather, it appears to me, as if the author never lets his

main character suffer mentally throughout the novel, in relation to

the crime, that is. His only pain seems to be physical sicknes.

Raskolnikov commits a premeditated murder in a state of

delirium. He ends up committing a second murder, which he never ever

wanted to be responsible for. He kills Lizaveta, an exceedingly

innocent person. But does the author ever remind us of the murder at

any time in the novel again? Not in the physical sense of the crime

itself. The reader doesn't hear about how heavily the murders are

weighing on his heart, or how he is tormented by visions of the crime.

He doesn't feel the least bit guilty about having committed the crime,

only his pride's hurt. He doesn't mention the idea of the pain that

might arise from recurrent visions of the crime. Raskolnikov never

again recalls the massive amounts of blood everyw

that matter, ever cite the dramatic effect of the murders on

implanted in people's minds and the seed has spread too rapidly,

from another point of understanding. People are entitled to their own

does not contradict what I've said before. He doesn't view Siberia as

still hasn't found any reason to feel remorse for his crimes. He takes

bad at not being able to living up to his own ideas of greatness. He

Some common words found in the essay are:
Petersburg It's, Raskolnikov Christian, Fyodor Dostoevsky, committing murder, main character, visions crime, remorse crimes, doesn't feel, ,
Approximate Word count = 806
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)