A popular controversial issue today is whether children who are at risk for abuse remain with their families or not. Many people feel differently about this issue. Some people feel that it would be best for the children to remain with their intact families. There are others that feel that it is not in the best interest of the kids to stay in an environment that might cause them harm. When it comes to this issue I have mixed feelings.
In regarding this topic I feel in some situations it would be best for the kids if they were taken out of their homes. For instance, if they have parents that are using drugs who refuse to seek any type of help, it's in the children best interest if they are taken out of that environment. To let kids stay in such a place where more harm might come upo9n them would be a crime. As Mary-Lou Weisman states " safet
Lisa Kolb states "family preservation services are designed to protect children who are at immediate risk of out-of-home placement, by providing immediate, comprehensive, 24-hour in home services to these children and their families." Mary-Lou Weisman however, feels that family preservation services are not always the best solutions for the kids. As one can see I feel both these authors are correct depending on the situations. However, one thing I know for sure is that every child deserves to have love and happiness.
y is the key issue." I think she's absolutely correct, one should always put their children safety above all other things. Children should also be taken out of homes where they are getting abuse. If they remain in homes where they are consistently being abuse or witness someone getting abuse, they might later in life become
All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009
Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA Webmasters make $$$$