The definition of poverty is the centre of a farce debut. This is if the definition is 'absolute' or 'relative' poverty. The farce intensity of this debut became prominent in the late part of the 19th century and the early parts of the 20th century. This was when people started to feel that some thing most is do about the growing level of inequality and 'poverty'. This was the founding step of the welfare state and the benefits system in action today. This then started people thinking how to judge if people needed these benefits and how best to measure whom should. Different sociological view have different view on the matter not only weather 'absolute' or 'relative' poverty is the corrected definition but how to solve the problem of poverty if poverty is the problem at all.

All thou the new right are not a sociological group in essence it still holds a view of sociological matters. The new right has very definite views on this matter. They feel that the people are only poor if they lack the things that are needed for life. This is food, water, clean air and shelter; this is 'absolute' poverty. In this model very few people within our society are defined as

Just as poverty is seen to be an indicator of class and gender relations in an industrial society, so poverty has been seen as an indicator of unequal economic relations between different countries. The poverty of the third world countries being directly related to the accumulation of wealth in developed countries.

The Marxists in part agree with the 'relative' definition of poverty but feel that poverty is not the issue. They feel that looking at poverty distracts from the wider picture. That it is not poverty that is important but that of inequality. But the Marxists say that they have curie for both 'relative' and 'absolute' poverty. This is of course communism, the Marxist believes that 'absolute' poverty well be removed with the removal of all forms of stratification and the redistribution of wealth. The problem of 'relative' poverty will be removed as in communism every one is equal and no one would be in a better position then an other.

in poverty and only the third world countries have a large amount of the population that are defined as within poverty. The view of the new right is that the work is out there for the poor to build their way up out of poverty but they are to lazy to do so.

When it comes do to the debut if 'relative' or 'absolute' measures of poverty come to a conclusion, which is the dominant is still unclear. They both hold their own

Some common words found in the essay are:
, United Britain, 'absolute' poverty, 'relative' poverty, 'relative' 'absolute', measures poverty, poverty seen, definition poverty, 'absolute' measures poverty, 'relative' 'absolute' poverty, measures poverty looking, poverty third, defined poverty, poverty third world, world countries, third world, 'absolute' 'relative' poverty,
Approximate Word count = 925
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)