else, society, education,government and so forth had their

basis in the individuals rights to his own liberty. Noone,

no member of society, government, even God, if he appeared

before an individual, could inforce his will upon him. That

is not to say that you couldnt change someones mind through

discussions, but instead, that noone had a right to force his

views upon another. Your happiness is yours(individual) to

enjoy without any infringements. Conversations between

individuals or groups of individuals is essential in

developing the notion of liberty. Mill claims that you should

feel free to convey your views openly without forcing them

onto others. After all, a man who learns from noone but

himself has a fool for a teacher. There is however an

exception to this rule. That is, if an individual in

any way harms or comes onto anothers rights to liberty, or

causes a social threat, hence he or she is subjected to

forced inclinations by other members of society. For example,

walking around nude on the streets of Cairo might be youre cup

requirement for being an individual as well. But once again,

believed in laissez-fairre for the very reason that it

beliefs as the truth. Even if there are a thousand people

you offend other individuals, you are in fact infringing on

Therefore, it is up to the individuals themselves to conclude

society must be able to keep an open mind towards other

power. This is a true democratic state, with individuals as

happiness will lead to nothing more than stagnation.

Some common words found in the essay are:
According Mill, JSMill-On Liberty, outside society, customs traditions,
Approximate Word count = 799
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)