The Effects of Excuse Validation in Reducing Negative Affect
Excuse-making is a common strategy people invoke to feel better following a negative event. When excuses are advanced in public, their effectiveness may depend on whether they are validated by others. The present study was conducted to assess the emotional impact on participants of having their excuses validated by a supportive stranger in a conversation about a real life negative event, as compared to receiving no support from an attentive audience. Participants were thirty one male and thirtynine female undergraduate students, who participated for course credit. participants' affective state was assessed prior to and after talking to a supportive stranger who either validated or did not validate their excuses. It was hypothesized that participants in the excuse-validation condition would report lower levels of negative affect at the post-conversation assessment than participants whose excuses were not validated. The results indicated that excuse-validation is an effective form of social support and is necessary for publicly made excuses to allevia
It is unclear whether excuses provide relief from negative events when they are advanced outside of the lab, in public contexts. Few researchers have assessed the effectiveness of publicly-made excuses. Three studies (Denton & Zarbatany, 1995; mehlman & Snyder, 1985; Schonback, 1990), however, suggest the effectiveness of publicly-made excuses may depend on the audience who receives the excuse and context in which the excuse is invoked. Social psychology is replete with evidence that people who receive information that threatens their sense of self, such as a negative evaluation, will distort the information in self-serving ways (see Miller & Porter, 1988; Snyder & Higgins, 1988; Taylor & Brown, 1988, for reviews). Snyder, Higgins, and Stucky (1983) have demonstrated that making excuses (e.g., trivializing negative feedback, making an external attribution for the cause of an unfavorable outcome) is a common way in which people attempt to construct a less threatening reality following upsetting experiences. A study by Schonback (1990) revealed th
Some common words found in the essay are:
Denton Zarbatany, , Mehlman Snyder, Higgins Stucky, Snyder Higgins, Dendton Zarbatany, Taylor Brown, negative affect, alleviate negative affect, participants excuses validated, excuses validated, participants excuses, alleviate negative, snyder higgins, social support, Miller Porter, mehlman snyder, denton zarbatany 1995, higgins 1988, mehlman snyder 1985, snyder higgins 1988, snyder 1985, support strategy,
Approximate Word count = 710
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
