powerful all knowing, and all good (all PKG)

P2) If an all PKG being existed then there would be no evil.

---------------------------------------------------------

qG??????p ?††????

For this paper I am going to discuss Sobers

schenatization of the argument from evil. The purpose of

this argument is to disprove the existence of an all knowing,

all powerful, and all good god. Throughout the course of

this paper I am going to prove that this argument is sound,

and that it does stand up to the soul building criticism.

Before I can prove that this argument is indeed a sound

one, I must first give a brief definition of the terms

validity, and soundness. An argument is valid if and only if

it is structured so that it is impossible for it to have true

premises and a false conclusion at the same time. An

argument is sound if it is valid and its premises are true.

it is important for an argument to be validly structured

because then a stable conclusion can be derived from its

structured and its premises to be true, I can conclude this

be seen in premise three. The consequent of premise two has

structured I will show that its premises are true thus making

most definitely proves that evil does exist.

beginning. Furthermore since this being is all good it would

all if a (PKG) god did exist then their should be no need for

the past, is happening in the present, and will happen in the

Second of all even if an all (PKG) god did allow soul

means that premise one is stating a widely accepted view of

Some common words found in the essay are:
God P1, Premise PKG, War II, soul building, P2 PKG, building evil, pkg god, P1 God, argument sound, soul building evil, god exist, evil exist, pkg god exist, validly structured, argument evil, argument validly, exist evil, argument validly structured, structured premises true, validly structured premises,
Approximate Word count = 1067
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)