The Ontoligical Argument
Many people have tried to prove through many ways that God exists. Anselm used the ontological argument, proposing that if God could be thought of and perceived, then God has to exist. At the center of the ontological argument is the idea or concept of existence. The Ontological argument is a group of different philosophers arguments for the existence of God. "Ontological" means talking about being and so in the Philosophy case, that being is the existence or being of God. The ontological argument differs from other arguments in favor of God because of the fact that it is an a priori deductive argument, a priori means that a person arguing this can reach a certain conclusion by the use of reason and not proof. A deductive argument means that if the premises that are put into the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Thus, Anselm tends to base his argument on the definitions and the terms that he used. Anselm's first form of the argument is that God is "that than which none greater can be conceived" (45) . Firstly, it must be emphasised that Anselm's definition does not limit God to being the "greatest" but Anselem makes it known that nothing greater can be thought than God himself. Therefore, God should no
People like Anselem have tried to prove the existence of God throughout the ages. Some of their arguments are good, while others are not as convincing. All of the ontological arguments are either invalid or open to the door to many questions which would be hard to address. In general, then, the problem with ontological arguments is that their conclusions cannot involve expressions with ontological commitment unless those commitments were introduced by expressions used in the premises; they are therefore most likely to be question-begging or invlaid. I believe that if a god existed, there would be evidence of its existence. Its influence would be revealed in prayers answered everywhere. Its knowledge would be revealed through prophets and books which actually had something intelligent to say. Anselm defines God but he doesn't clearly identify him. In order to identify him, we would have to carefully define "great" and then look for the greatest thing that we can identify in the world. It is different among everybody. Those who say they can identify God would also share different views. We might identify Jesus, Socrates, Muhammad, Confucius, or the Buddha as God. On another definition of great we may also possibly identify nature itself as God. If we do not proceed in this fashion, the word "great" is just meaningless, without any substance. Unless we know what "great" really means, we don't have any reason to think that something existing in rea
Some common words found in the essay are:
God God, God Ontological, People Anselem, God Anselem, Buddha God, , Thomas Aquinas, God Psalms, god exists, existence god, god exist, ontological argument, exists reality, god god, exists understanding, god exists understanding, god ontological, god anselem, god perceived god, understand believe, existence god ontological, perceived god exist,
Approximate Word count = 983
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
