The relationship between rhetoric and social conflict

A detailed Summary of The relationship between rhetoric and social conflict

The Relationship between Rhetoric and Social Conflict

In society there are daily occurrences that happen as a result of rhetoric, which then question and mold our individuality. How we react to these responses define us as a society and can then cause us to have a conflict socially. These occurrences challenge our perceptions allowing us to think independently about each issue. Without the linkage of rhetoric and conflict, we would have a difficult time justifying our understanding of these issues.

A reaction to rhetoric can also characterize us from each other in a way that creates a singular identity. This individuality combined with the identities of others, make up our community and allow rhetoric and conflict to occur almost naturally. To further explain why rhetoric and conflict are so important we must understand the importance of this issue, in trying to relate everyday activities as examples of rhetoric and conflict. Our Society creates certain rhetorical ideologies, which are contained in social institutions, such as churches, communities, or clubs, in which conformity is a must. These ideologies bring people together to stand behind a common interest and fight for their own beliefs, morals, and values. It is w

hen these social institutions collide with each other that social conflict is formed and problems arise.

The relationship between rhetoric and conflict are crucial to our understanding of these concepts. To truly understand why rhetoric is such an important factor in conflict one must be able to distinguish the difference. Rhetoric makes the conflict a conflict without it no one would be able to express themselves logically. Without rhetoric our own ideas individually and socially would not be able to grow. We are given the opportunity to discuss and feel our own beliefs, which is the key to our understanding of the surrounding world.

On the other hand, a negative response is just as easy to elicit. Depending on ones beliefs, rhetoric will come into effect when there is a situation that is not agreeable by both parties. How this situation is illustrated is that rhetoric is the approach of the issue, the disagreement is the conflict, and the two arguments being expressed is the social interaction.

An article found in Newsweek "Technology School Conflict" describes a similar but distinct case of controversy in schools. This can be shown as an example of how rhetoric and conflict occurs almost illegitimately in our lives. One way to establish this, as a social issue is to break it down and examine what the conflict really involves. This article talks about whether gifted children have the right to attend a public school outside their district, and if so where should the money for their tuition go. The two parties involved are the parents of these children and the school board. The conflict in this case is whether something is right or wrong, otherwise known as the prize to be won. This situation deals with more than just the boundaries of each district;

Some common words found in the essay are:
Moore Moore, School Conflict, Social Conflict, rhetoric conflict, social conflict, own beliefs, structure enactment, relationship rhetoric, conflict able, importance issue, rhetoric social conflict, rhetoric social, hand smoke, social institutions, relationship rhetoric social,

Approximate Word count = 1200
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)

Category: Miscellaneous