The Superfluous Man as a Mirror of Our Time
Mikhail Lermontov's protagonist, Grigory Pechorin, belongs to that group of literary characters known individually as the "superfluous man." Generally an intelligent, educated individual, the superfluous man would appear to be one who has been either unjustly treated or outcast by society in general. The superfluous man attempts to find a place for himself in the world, but perhaps due to the combination of his talents, upbringing, personality and intelligence, continually finds himself on the outs with his peers. If the above definition is accepted as valid, then Pechorin might appear to be the consummate superfluous man. From the outpouring of his tale of woe to Princess Mary, we may come to the conclusion that Pechorin has no concept of cause and effect, at least not as it applies to himself as the cause. Moreover, it becomes fairly apparent that he is of the belief that he is a victim of the world, which is more interesting, as one considers the culture of victimization that has become popular in recent years. Who has not heard the excuse, "I did it because my (parents/state representative/dog) (harassed/bit/abused) me when I was a child." In my opinion, the growing interest in pop psychology and the related fields of
social psychology and child psychology have greatly contributed to the decay of moral rectitude and the concept of taking responsibility for one's own actions. Certainly, upbringing does have a great deal to do with what sort of person we become, and I have come to the belief - reinforced by reading about these superfluous men - that a child, given all it needs to survive and learn intellectually, but no moral boundaries, will come to be greatly like a sociopathic personality. They will most likely be incapable of relating to others, save as far as they are themselves effected. They will not display anything near the level of enlightened self-interest that enables society. For all intents and purposes, they will be a sociopath, and due to the initial lack of guidance, they will be at best highly resistant to change, and at worst, totally irredeemable. The translator attributes Pechorin's capriciousness to the lack of employment for his gifts. I do not agree with that assessment, as it has been my experience that only those who have made up their minds to lack direction will be unable to find an activity that occupies their mind and appeals to them. One possible pursuit would be some form of art. Skill matters little, if the activity is pleasing. Cultural appreciation, gastronomical excess, or sexual exercise would all be suitable endeavors. We see that Pechorin certainly takes pleasure in the company of women, though in his own words, "I must confess I don't really like strong-willed women," (111), the female sex does not h
Some common words found in the essay are:
Maxim Maximych's, Princess Mary, Bela's Azamat, Grigory Pechorin, Vera Mary, Mikhail Lermontov's, sort person, own actions, incapable changing,
Approximate Word count = 1044
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
