Schoenber's response towards the necessity of Progressive music
The eighteenth centuries are reasonably described as an era of musical common practice, when composers of different nationalities and temperaments nonetheless wrote music that was stylistically and structurally similar in important respects. however, in contrast, the twentieth century has been a period of great and increasing diversity of both style and structure. More specifically, music criticism has divided twentieth century music into two opposing groups; the neoclassical and the progressive.This view has remained influential up to the present day. It depicts the neoclassicists (especially Stravinsky) as attempting to restore and revive aspects of earlier music while the progressive (Schoenberg, Berg and Webern) pushed music forward in a direction determined by the historical developments of late nineteenth century chromaticism. Neoclassical music is seen as relatively simple, static,and objective as having revived the classical ideals of balance and proportion. But Progressive music is seen as relatively complex, developmental, and emotionally expressive as having extended the tradition of romanticism. Stravinsky realises and asks himself,"Was I merely trying to refit old ships while the other side - Schoenberg - sought new f
For Schoenberg, the necessity was what history required. His conception was that the music has to develop forward and he thoght of it as hos task; the duty of developing his ideas for the sake of progress in music. In order to fulfil a task, he realises the importance of performing their works by establishing the 'Society for Private Musical Performance' to create a chance for introducing the true modern music to the public. Some of hos works were written mainly for the performances, 'Pierrot Lunaire' is a good example. In order to create the characteristic of the twentieth century music, Schoenberg adopts the methode of music by his predecessors, but in different context to the neoclassicism. The requirement of certain method or technique and the analysis of the early music enabledto form a continuous line of the progress. For Schoenberg, progress was what history requires. Music is in continuous process of evolution. It is the composer's task to comprehend the historical trend and to keep it going in the proper direction. Schoenberg mentions,"While composing for me had been a pleasure, now it became a duty. I knew I had to fulfil the task; I had to express what was necessary to be expressed and I knew I had the duty of developing my ideas for the sake of progree in music, whether I liked it or not." Webern spoke of a similar sense of compulsion and of the weight of the past pushing him: "and never in the history of music has there been such resistance as there was to. Naturally it's nonsense to advance 'social objections'. Why don't people understand that? Our push forward had to be made, it was a push forward such as never was before. In fact we have to break new ground with each work: each work is something different, something new." For both Schoenberg and Webern, the tradition was not a generous friend or kind teacher; it was an intolerant despot. For Schoenberg, the only logical and responsible musi
Some common words found in the essay are:
Musical Performances, Berg Webern, Italians Wagner, , Schoenberg Webern, Surprisingly Schoemberg's, Arnold Schoenberg, Musical Performance', Spring' Stravinsky's, Schoenberg Stravinsky, twentieth century, century music, 'pierrot lunaire', progressive music, twentieth century music, music predecessors, duty developing ideas, developing ideas, earlier music, analysis music, duty developing, fulfil task, methode composing twelve, music seen relatively, developing ideas sake,
Approximate Word count = 1294
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
