99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

Critique of The Original Affluent Society Article

In his article, "The Original Affluent Society," Marshall Sahlins shows that hunter-gatherer societies are by nature affluent because "all the people's material wants were easily satisfied." Their low standard of living, and correspondingly few material needs, implies that the basic necessities of hunter-gatherers are usually met. Sahlins contrasts the hunter-gatherer concept of affluence with the capitalist notion of wealth: "modern capitalist societies, however richly endowed, dedicate themselves to the proposition of scarcity." People in industrialized nations work long hours and hoard large amounts of material goods for the fear of future scarcity. Hunter-gatherers, on the other hand, feast when they have food and move on to more lush surroundings when food supplies grow scarce.

Although the individuals living in hunter-gather societies have few poss


Sahlins does not suggest that hunter-gather societies are superior to capitalist ones, but rather, seeks to expose the ethnocentricism inherent in many ethnographies of hunter-gatherer cultures. Peeking into a hunter-gather society with the biases of the modern world, the anthropologist might be tempted to conclude that hunter-gatherers are poor, and subsequently, deprived. Sahlins shows that on the contrary, hunter-gatherers are affluent because they desire so little and because they base their existence on the idea that nature is inherently productive, abundant, and yielding.

The fault with ethnocentric analyses of hunter-gather societies is that many anthropologists tend to few hunter-gather societies as an evolutionary stage, thereby implying that hunter-gatherer societies are inferior to modern industrial ones. What Sahlins shows is that hunter-gat

Some common words found in the essay are:
Marshall Sahlins, Soceity Sahlins, hunter-gather societies, hunter-gatherer societies, capitalist ones, , Original Affluent, sahlins contrasts, modern world, hunter-gatherer cultures, hunter-gather society, hunter-gatherers affluent, material possessions, material wealth,
Approximate Word count = 578
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers