99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

Applied Ethics-Kant, Aristotle, and Plato on Steroid Use in Professional Baseball

In the popular press, one of the common defenses of the ethics of steroid use in professional baseball is that it does no harm, other than harm the body of the professional player who willingly undertakes the risk for his vocation and a high salary. Professional sports, the argument goes, are a risky endeavor as it is, so is this really such a terrible thing? Perhaps, the defender might concede, anabolic steroid use also gives the user a slight edge over his fellow competitors. But how different is this edge from benefiting from superior training techniques, better coaching, or simply being a part of a better team? In such a view, steroids are merely another powerful pill to give already extraordinarily endowed sporting individual an extra edge on the playing field, as they pursue short-term fame, fortune, and athletics success for their teammates, fans, and cities.

But even if these arguments were valid to some degree, the philosopher Immanuel Kant would argue that, according to his catego


rical imperative, one ought to always act as if one's every action were to set a universal law for all humanity-whether one is Barry Bonds or simply Barry Smith. To transgress the laws, even the rules and laws of a mere game is wrong because it means the other individuals in other professions might and could use one's own ethical transgression to justify their own moral foibles-a stockbroker might consider his actions in taking advantage of insider trading tips justified, even though this gave him an unfair advantage in making money by the same rationale of 'any means necessary' to win. A child might see the abuse steroid use does unto the body as justified because she saw her favorite pitcher do the same. Of course, the rules and laws about steroid use within baseball are notably lax, perhaps undercutting Kantian analysis-but even if this were the case, this does not excuse the baseball player nor the hypothetical stockbroker or child the obligation to obey the doctrine of universal laws, n

Some common words found in the essay are:
Barry Smith, , Plato Republic, Immanuel Kant, baseball player, Barry Bonds, one's self, pleasures moment, taking hold, one's own, reason success, rules laws,
Approximate Word count = 673
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers