Leadership Styles: Democratic, Autocratic and Laissez-Faire
The democratic form of leadership is also known as the participative form of leadership. In this particular form of leadership, the leader gathers his workforce and includes them in the process of decision making. They all share their ideas and feel as if they are a part of the important decision making process. It is not a requirement to apply all the suggestions and opinions given in the process but it is important not to overlook those that are worthy to be applied. A solution is derived through consensus. The effects of the democratic form of leadership boosts the morale of everyone within an organization thus increasing productivity levels. Within an organization when there is a lack of motivation, this form of leadership should be used to make everyone feel as if they are part of the team. In a study it was seen that Swedish managers prove to practice the democratic style of leadership more than the Americans (R. Zemke, p.44-48). This leadership is considered to be most effective and many people opt for the democratic leadership style. Like Mary D. Poole states "Leadership should be more participative than directive, more enabling than performing" (Mary D. Poole).Many famous leaders have used this style of leadership and
have benefited great success by it. One of the names known to all is that of Nelson Mandela who exhibited this style of leadership. His inclination to this form was so great that in one of his letters he expressed his fear that tribal rule would destroy the democratic leadership (Nelson Mandela). Another explicit example of democratic leadership was practiced by yet another famous leader known to us by the name of Winston Churchill. "Churchill passed the true test of democratic leadership by reaching the masses without resorting to demagoguery or compromising his principles" (Jonathan Sikorsky). Leaders like Benazir Bhutto from Pakistan, has shown the application of democratic leadership style and her party is considered to be the largest political party in the country. Similarly throughout history there have been many leaders who have adopted this form of leadership style including some of the earliest Muslim leaders like the Caliph Abu Bakr. Each leadership style is effective provided it is adopted at the right time. They all however come with their set of advantages and disadvantages. The main advantage associated with the democratic style of leadership is motivation. Motivation is the key to higher and better levels of productivity. When an organization has a high motivation level among their employees its productivity increases. One can say that productivity is directly proportional to motivation. However, regardless of how important this style is, it has some disadvantages as well. To increase motivation levels among the workforce it is important that the
Some common words found in the essay are:
Autocratic Laissez-Faire, , Anonymous Politics, Nelson Mandela, Bhutto Pakistan, Churchill Churchill, Americans Zemke, Mary Poole, style leadership, form leadership, democratic leadership, Bakr Democratic, Poole Leadership, democratic style, leadership style, democratic style leadership, autocratic style, style style adopted, productivity levels, style style, styles leadership, opinions ideas, democratic style style, democratic leadership style, democratic form leadership,
Approximate Word count = 1060
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
