99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

The Effect of Downsizing on Manufacturing Industries

The amount of information on the effects of down sizing on manufacturing was not plentiful, however one main point that flows through all of the articles is that even though down sizing may be done to help a company it can end up hurting them in the long run. In the paragraphs to follow we look at the effects that downsizing has on people and companies as well as look at whether or not downsizing is truly the answer.

Parker (2003)Reports that in 2003 the expected job losses among the manufacturing industries in Great Britain would create the effects of rising input costs and oil price increase on the job cuts; Downturn of the purchasing managers' index for manufacturing; Decrease in the rate of manufacturer's orders. So even though these cuts may be necessary he pointed out that it would have an overall negative effect.

The Midwest may be the focus of manufacturing layoffs and financial woes(Link, 2005), but according to this survey, people who live in the area of the country that includes Cleveland and Detroit in the low- to moderate-income lax bracket are using less of their income to pay for housing than other areas of the country. The study, dubbed the Housing Landscape for America's working Families 2005, revealed that fro


A second source of uncertainty (Palley, 1999) concerns the sustainability of the growth of personal consumption spending, which had been the principal engine of economic expansion in the past two years. In 1997, personal consumption expenditure contributed 59 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) growth, and in 1998 it contributed 85 percent. Meanwhile, in 1997 and 1998 nominal personal consumption expenditures grew 5.3 percent and 5.7 percent, respectively, while nominal disposable income grew only 4.7 percent and 4.0 percent. From the Federal Reserve's perspective, this pattern is not sustainable since consumption is growing faster than potential output, which implies that the economy will eventually hit an inflationary wall. An alternative interpretation is that such growth is not sustainable because households must inevitably run short of financial wherewithal, and when this happens, an economic decline will ensue. According to this view, recession rather than inflation is the danger.

However, it is not just this interconnectedness of negative factors that lies behind the increased plausibility of a crash. A second and more important factor concerns changes in the structure of the domestic and global economy that have diminished the presence of "automatic stabilizers" and replaced them with "automatic destabilizers."These destabilizers work in a pro-cyclical fashion. On the cyclical upswing they make for stronger and longer expansions, but on the downswing they make for deeper and more sustained contractions.

Isabella (1999) reported that corporate restructuring can be threatening to a company's employees. But it can also give some of those employees' opportunities for career advancement and growth. General Motors reduced its work force by 25 percent in the past. AT&T will cut its payroll by 27,000. IBM will let go 10,000 workers. United Technologies will terminate 11,000 employees. Unisys will reduce its ranks by 10,000. Newspapers and business publications are replete with stories and statistics, such as those above, of organizational down-sizing. Although companies that down-size often successfully anticipate and prepare for the needs of employees being released (through outplacement counseling, career counseling, and job placement), they may be unprepared for the strong emotions, lengthy adjustment time, diminished morale, and lower productivity experienced by the survivors of massive restructuring. In fact, companies often have surprisingly little information about the adjustments and assessments of those ultimately responsible for revitalizing the company. How survivors view the down-sizing over time and what issues need to be confronted are critical questions for executives in downsized organizations. The survivors are too important a resource to risk alienating. Therefore, it is necessary to examine how employees interpret and react to a downsizing, the dangers of not adequately responding to their needs, and some traditional solutions as well as methods for searching out more creative answers (Pinsonneault, 2002). .

(Palley, 1999)stated that for policymakers at the Federal Reserve, the goal is a soft landing, though some (those who continue to believe in the natural rate of unemployment) think a bumpy landing is desirable since they believe that the unemployment rate is now below the natural rate. Thus not only is the economy expanding more rapidly than potential output, but the level of output already exceeds the level of potential output. Consequently, not only must the rate of output growth decrease, but the rate of unemployment must also rise back to the natural rate in order to avoid accelerating inflation.

Why is the gap between the potential and actual number of jobs moving offshore so large? Many observers think that regulatory barriers stand in the way, but MGI interviews indicate that company-specific considerations (such as management attitudes, organizational structure, and scale) are

Some common words found in the essay are:
Federal Reserve, Institute MGI, East Asia's, India Philippines, Chairman Greenspan, Indeed United, United Technologies, China India, Mexico Robert, Mumbai Indians, service jobs, labor market, stock market, global labor market, university graduates, global financial, robert 1996, palley 1999, global labor, output growth, offshore talent, rate output growth, stock market crash, employment multinational companies, suitable employment multinational,
Approximate Word count = 6356
Approximate Pages = 25 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on The Effect of Downsizing on Manufacturing Industries

Impact of Downsizing2104 words
Downsizing724 words
Middle Class2670 words
Define The Information Technology Revolution And Critically ...4562 words
Define The Information Technology Revolution And Critically ...4536 words

Look at even more essays on The Effect of Downsizing on Manufacturing Industries
More Misc Essays

Professional Papers:
US Downsizing Effort to Reduce Military1597 words
Issues of Production ampamp Manufacturing Management6841 words
Downsizing At ATampampT3703 words
Aspects of Unemployment2696 words
Feasibility of Downsizing8301 words
NAFTA2592 words
Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers