In Favor Of Same Sex Marriage: Refuting The Opposition
While a majority of Americans enthusiastically support equal rights for all citizens including homosexuals, few support same sex marriage (Bidstrup, 2004). Despite this same sex marriage is a right that should be provided to same sex couples as any other government benefits. Same sex couples deserve equal protection under the law just as any other couple would. This paper will argue in favor of same sex marriage, by presenting counter arguments to same sex marriage and refuting them. Those opposed to legalizing same sex marriages argue "on the basis of plurality" (Pew Forum, 2005). A majority of opponents suggest their opposition is based purely on subjective distaste or opposition to the idea (roughly 35%) (Pew Forum, 2005). This is not adequate basis however to design a constitutional amendment barring same sex marriage. Under the constitution all citizens are afforded their right to equal protection under the law and certain freedoms. This includes the right to the sacrament of marriage. The notion that anything should be outlawed based purely on subjective reasoning is more autocratic or tyrannical in nature than democratic, and democracy forms the foundation under this country thrives each day. Most of the subject
Yet another far fetched argument in opposition of gay marriage is that legalizing same sex marriages will result in chaos and legalization of abominable practices including bestiality or incest (Bidstrup, 2004). This is a fallacy "calculated to create fear" among those that are ignorant (Bidstrup, 2004). Same sex marriages are not in the same category as bestiality or incest, behaviors that are clearly harmful and devastating. Opponents should also note that there are many less reputable citizens including pedophiles and murderers that are currently allowed to marry (Bidstrup, 2004); certainly homosexual couples desiring to marry have a more pure motive than these corrupt citizens. Many opponents fear gay marriage will have a negative impact on the "traditional family structure" hence express their opposition. Many fear that such marriages would "Undermine the traditional American family", as much as 76% of those that oppose gay marriage (Pew Forum, 2005). Other reasons include gay marriage goes against personal religious beliefs (roughly 82%) (Pew Forum, 2005) again not a reason to support opposition. The constitution again protects the rights of citizens and their religious beliefs. While opponents may not support same sex marriage based on personal religious beliefs, there are an equal number of gay citizens that support marriage based on their beliefs. One cannot assume that certain Christian morals or other fundamentalist principles are more important than the beliefs of gay citizens. Every community member has the right to express their religious beliefs in the democracy in which we live. Further biblical moralisms do not dictate the law in America; the first amendment of the constitution very clearly does not support rules on anyone based on religion (Bi
Some common words found in the essay are:
Pew Forum, , bidstrup 2004, sex marriage, pew forum 2005, religious beliefs, forum 2005, pew forum, sex marriages, gay marriage, homosexual couples, marriage based, support sex, marriage bidstrup 2004, support sex marriage, favor sex marriage, bidstrup 2004 homosexual,
Approximate Word count = 1200
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|