Theories of Meaning and Value in Action
One must note that various and several philosophies of cognition, meaning and value are present in one's working environment, as well as in one's personal life situations. These various may or may not be effective, and it is only when analyzes and studies all these situations and the philosophies involved in each of them that one would be able to come to any sort of conclusion, and thereafter make changes in them to suit the environment. For a start, one can begin with the examination of 'meaning' as such. What exactly is this, and how is it manifested in one's personal life and in work environments? It must be noted, at the outset, that meaning can be borne by all types of objects and signs and symbols. It can also be borne and depicted by all types of signs, whether they are artificial or natural. Some examples are a road sign, which one can read and understand the meaning of, the sound of a pistol, which in itself may convey a great variety of meaning, the clap of thunder, or the flash of lightning, both natural signs of a storm brewing or in progress, which one can derive meaning from. (Markovic, 1984)It must be said that in as much as any object at all cab be termed as a 'sign', in the same way, any object at all can be
According to Dummett, the meaning of a sentence, for example, must be derived form its 'assertibility condition', rather than from its 'truth condition'. Therefore if one were to derive meaning form a sentence, or from something that someone has said, then one must perforce know its basic assertibility condition in order to derive meaning from it. (Williamson, 2002) According to the so called 'Dialectical Theory of Meaning', developed in the days of socialism, a sort of dialectical synthesis of all different theories of meaning was attempted, and the ultimate result was that 'meaning' as such is nothing but an extremely complicated and complex relationship, wherein the subject is able to relate to an objective content, through a set of syntactic rules, which in turn would give rise to an 'intentional object' within a particular pragmatic and practical context. (Zizek, 1997) The two early and most recognized Cognitive Social theories are those of Bandura and Mischel. While Bandura pioneered the study of 'observational learning', Mischel conceived of the five different kinds of cognitive social learning variables. Bandura believed that, rather than operating in a mechanistic manner, a belief in reinforcement would be able to provide more information about future reinforcements as well. This type of information can be gleaned from watching and observing the models' behavior, rather than try to experience it oneself. This definition is completely different from that of Skinner, who believed that an individual would have to personally experience reinforcement in order to increase a target behavior. Bandura also believed in the fact that 'thinking' as such would definitely never occur within a 'black box', and he also believed that this must be considered to be an important activity in its own right. (Cognitive Social Theories) Use value can be less than, but never greater than exchange value. Use value need not be concerned with political economy, and at the same time, exchange value can be considered not to be an absolute concept. Value is in general differentiated and distinguished from 'price' because of the variable 'purchasing power of money' and this can in effect be measured against an overall average of several other commodities, and not just one. Value in general fluctuates according to supply, and demand fluctuates around a 'natural value'. (Theories of Value) Therefore, it can be stated that while theories and concepts on value explore into how individuals generally value things both positively and negatively, the various reasons that they state in making their evaluations can be related to the theories of 'goodness' which investigate what thing are good, and what 'good' actually means in the abstract sense of the word. (Goodness and Value Theory) What is the role that theories and philosophies on 'value' play in a personal situation, and in a work environment? Within an organization, if for example, a 'value statement' was to be made, then one must note that a value statement as such has an inherent imperative and ethical character. A goal is also referred to as a 'value premise'. (Mouzelis, 1967) However, in action, the differences and the distinction between means and ends, between being and doing result in a particular structure of action, from the beginning to the middle to the end, and it is upon this that most of ethical terminology and also quite a few forms of ethical theory, that is, ethics of virtues, actions, and of consequences, are all based. It must be remembered that the more common definitions of 'teleological' and of 'deontological' ethics, when considered in terms of means and ends, would most probably result in some logical confusion. (The Value Structure of Action) Within an organization, especially in today's increasing globalization, learning has become increasingly predominant. A cognitive base, a behaviorist base, a human orientation, and a situational base are several different types
Some common words found in the essay are:
, Structure Action, Department Labor, Search Meaning, Kahneman Tversky, Kuhn Dean, Newell Simon, Social Theories, Orientation Learning, Value Theory, values life, means count', theories cognition, one's life, mathematics education, 'only means count', exchange value, 'only means, cognitive social, one's workplace, one's personal, one's personal life, cognitive social theories, 'the means count', psychology mathematics education,
Approximate Word count = 5185
Approximate Pages = 21 (250 words per page double spaced)
|