Being a Good Biologist
When we think about defining a good biologist, the origin of what is considered in culturally common thought of as ‘good’ science and our definition of what defines a ‘biologist’ will differ. A biologist can be often described as a scientist who studies living organisms and their relationship to their environment. When looking at being a good biologist, the gathering and evaluation of evidence is essential to the definition of a good scientist must posses. Whether or not one chooses to challenge the concept of evolution, a general acceptance of the scientific community, does not deny the possibility of being a good biologist. Some would consider the statement “Evolution is only a theory, it hasn’t been proved” as fact. On the contrary, the lack of proof isn't a weakness and claiming infallibility for one's conclusions is a sign of hubris (Worf, Benjamin. 1940. Science & Linguistics). In this world, nothing has ever been rigorously proved. Often a scientist findings proposes an idea that may attack all cherished philosophical doctrines of what we know about science. Albert Einstien, popular among young scientists, was certainly not taken seriously as a ‘good physicist’ until the old scientist who rejected his theories had died
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Charles Darwin, Imagine Kepler, Earth History, , Lecture Kepler, Worth Publishers, Discussion Prove, Misconceptions Evolution, Science Linguistics, Albert Einstien, biologist believe evolution, mathematical sense luxury, freeling 1998 lecture, real world, defining universe, luxury defining, sense luxury, scientific community, charles darwin, theory idea, luxury defining universe, sense luxury defining, rigorously proved, world rigorously, scientist findings,
Approximate Word count = 1100
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
