The written piece of Dennis O'Brien, "Against Gay Marriage - I: What Heterosexuality Means," discusses the idea that we must first look at the societal definition of marriage before we can pose judgements on homosexual marriages. O'Brien then continues on to denounce same-sex marriages, claiming they are not accepted into religion and in the values of Americans. Our society needs to accept all marriages and support the couple who is lucky enough to find a mate.
The article points out that if two people were to really be in love with each other, then genuine commitment would not need, "the sanctions of a judge or priest," (O'Brien, 662). O'Brien also states that couples are reluctant to wed because it, "destroys the honesty and commitment of true love," (662). If marriage destroys true love, then
why do we as a society look forward to uniting with another person? Marriage is the ultimate joining of two people who want to cement their love to each other and proclaim to live side by side for the rest of their lives.
Homosexuality is apparent, and homosexual marriages are becoming more frequent. Why can't we be delighted for a couple that has crossed paths and created a bond in which they can live in total euphoria? When we discover that a heterosexual marriage is planned, even between two people we don't even know, society instantaneously congratulates the couple and wishes them the best. Let's congratulate marriages of all sexes for finding a lifelong partner, instead of deciding who they can marry.
Another point that O'Brien makes is that heterosexuality is very important for continuing human evolution (663). This
All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009
Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA Webmasters make $$$$