The recent announcement that the House Republican leaders plan to raise $25 million for the trench warfare they expect to wage in the battle for control of the House in 2000 came as no surprise. What was noteworthy was their stated intention to collect this money through so-called soft money contributions, and not to reveal necessarily the particular source of such generous giving. That news has left even the more jaundiced observers of our campaign finance system shaking their heads at the out-of-control spending habits of many of the highest office holders in the land.
Last year, as readers will recall, the House gave overwhelming approval to the Shays-Meehan bill that effectively banned "soft" money fundraising. Unlike the "hard" money donations given to individual candidates that are subject to limits and other regulations, the "soft" money contributions that were once intended only for "party building"
If we are to make progress on these and other issues, we need to have campaign finance reform - sooner rather than later.
I am a strong proponent of the so-called Clean Money option to provide public financing and other comprehensive reforms, and I have a bill (HR 1739) which would expand upon and compliment what the voters of Massachusetts last year agreed to adopt.
purposes have been used in recent years to pay for radio and television ads and other campaign activities to the benefit of targeted candidates. Both major political parties have abused the system, contributing to public cynicism and distaste.
Again like last year, a discharge petition has been initiated - a process whereby a majority of House members can force a bill to be discharged literally from committee and brought to the floor for a vote, regardless of the desires of the House leadership. To date, 196 of the 202 signatures on the p
All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009
Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA Webmasters make $$$$