Death Penalty 10

A detailed Summary of Death Penalty 10

The death penalty is needed in the country, do to the high crime rate and violence. It helps as a deterred, stopping people from committing crime, such as murder. With the death penalty it also brings closure to the victims family, because they are reassured that the person that committed the crime is going to pay for what they have done.

The death penalty can also help save the taxpayers money if the execution is done an a timely manner. But as everything in this world nothing is perfect, with the death penalty affected some innocent people will be sentence to death, some of their rights might be violated, and with all the hatred in the world you will find a lot of racism.

The death penalty is costly do to the appeals process. A murder trial will normally takes much longer when the death penalty is an issue. Litigation cost includes the time of the judges, prosecutors and public defenders, as well as court reports and the high cost of briefs, all which are paid by the taxpayers.

"A 1982 study showed that when the death penalty was reintroduced in New York, the cost of the capital trial alone would more than double the cost of a life term in prison." (NY State Defenders Assn., Capital losses 1982) Flori

Many activist believe that innocent people will be put to death. "They believe these innocent people that are executed impose a burden on society. The innocent convict, and their families, were wrongly deprived of their lives. They believe that we have a choice that lets us reduce the wrongful action of wrongful conviction, we can choose incarceration over capital punishment."(Western Herald by Elisabeth Carnell)

Texas which had the highest murder rate in Houston (Harris County) occurring in 1981 with 701 murders. Since Texas reinstated the death penalty in 1982. Harris County has executed more murderers than any other city or state in the union and has seen the greatest reduction in murder from 701 in 1981 down to 261 in 1996 a 63% reduction representing a 270% differential.

The family would be at peace knowing that the criminal is going to be executed and can't cause pain to other families. Where as if they give him/ her life in prison, they may come up for parole every two years or even get out on parole. The family will have to relive the pain all over again every time its time for a parole hearing . The criminal should pay a penalty that is roughly equal to the loss incurred by the crime. In most cases of murder, where life is outlandishly cheated, the only punishment that can even approach that tremendous loss is execution.

Sometimes the innocent are put to death but by this happening it helps to make a better system. An execution of an innocent person is an accident no one intents to put the wrong person to death. Accidents happens in all walks of life, with cars, electricity and airplanes. No one hear activist "crying out" don't make cars, take them off of the roads or don't use electricity it might start a fire and that airplanes kill people don't fly. All of these accident, helped people to improve the products and problems. So sometimes innocent people are put to death, but most of the time the guilty are put to death. If we don't execute criminals for serious crimes we would have an even greater problem on our hands, such as hard core criminals killing innocent people trying to go on about their lives. So sometime innocent people will be put to death in trying to build a stable justice system. All human institutions are imperfect, innocent people are convicted of other crimes, but we should not throw out our entire criminal justice system.

With weakening due proc

Some common words found in the essay are:
Law Review, Harris County, Carnell Sometimes, Assn Capital, Death Penalty, North Carolina, Adam Bedan, Gary Gilmore, death penalty, innocent people, justice system, people death, death row, Den Hagg, innocent people death, death sentence, Jack Greenberg, effect death penalty, 1986 harvard, law review, appeals process, death believe, believe innocent people, 1986 harvard law, harvard law review,

Approximate Word count = 1635
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)

Category: Politics