Employment Relations Essay
The 1998 Waterfront Dispute was described by John Howard as "a defining moment in Australia’s industrial relations history." Do you agree with this statement? Support your view by discussing the events and outcomes of this dispute.John Howard’s comment on the 1998 Waterfront dispute between the Maritime Union of Australia and Patrick Stevedores was a hypocritical and ignorant description of one of Australia’s worst industrial relations disputes. The Australian Government considers that Australia is poorly served by its waterfront industry. The serious inefficiencies that have persisted on the waterfront, despite previous reforms, have acted as a brake on economic growth and international competitiveness. "The globalising strategies of both Labour and Liberal governments have intensified the pressure on Australian employers to maintain international competitiveness by cutting costs and increasing productivity." (Wiseman p1) In the lead up to the 1996 federal election, the Coalition advocated the prohibition of union preference with Mr Reith arguing that "where union membership was genuinely voluntary, unions are more likely to be responsive to the needs of their members." (Thorpe & McDonald p24) However, it is more
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Relations Act, Patrick Stevedoring, Equally Government, Labour Liberal, Industry Journal, Federal Court, Australian Government, Farmers Federation, John Howard, Dr Craik, patrick stevedoring, industrial relations, workplace relations, waterfront dispute, workplace relations act, relations act, national farmers federation, industry journal, labour industry, national farmers, 1998 waterfront dispute, journal 9, farmers federation, industry journal 9, labour industry journal,
Approximate Word count = 1314
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
