Many euthanasia cases are centered around situations similar to this, and are often justified by proving the patient

With MB now classified as "essentially dead", should we be allowed end the biological life of her now "non-MB" body? With the interests of the family in mind, we should. The family should not be made to deal with the agony of having the essentially lifeless body of MB continue to biologically live, when there is no hope for human life to return to it. The next question would now be: May we end her life? Once again the family should have the say in whether or not the body should continue to live. The fact is MB no longer can make this decision; not because she is not cognate, but because she no longer exists as a personality. Because of this, the body has to be placed in the hands of someone to make the decision to end the body's life, by whatever means are appropriate

Now the question is: Is MB "essentially dead"? In some aspects she certainly is not. Her reactions to pain and pleasure stimuli are synonymous with each respective stimulus (i.e. she reacts positively to positive stimuli and negatively to negative stimuli). Along the same lines, she also

Some common words found in the essay are:
Euthanasia Euthanasia, essentially dead, classified essentially, classified essentially dead, mb essentially dead, brain damage, pain pleasure stimuli, mb essentially, pain pleasure, pleasure stimuli, biological life, brain function, person dies,
Approximate Word count = 721
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)