In all 50 states there are mandatory seat belt laws in effect. The federal government has decided that its citizens cannot handle making a rational decision about whether or not to wear a seat belt. Failure to wear a seat belt results in fines ranging between

The overbearing power of the government may best be viewed in the rights parents have been robbed of. In May of 1996, President Bill Clinton announced that he was supporting a new nationwide teen curfew policy. This policy recommended weekday curfew at 9:00 PM, with punishments of fines and court summons for parents of the offenders. This policy relinquished the rights of parents to be parents. The government has decided when a child should return home. Even if a child has parental permission to be out after curfew, he will still receive a punishment from the government. Though curfew was initiated because of safety concerns, it allows the government to impose on a parent's child rearing abilities. Curfew should be a repsonibility of a parent, rather than that of the federal government.

$10 and $100, plus court costs, and any other surcharge t

Some common words found in the essay are:
Bill Clinton, , Belt Laws, federal government, government decided, belt laws, seat belt, wear seat belt, government makes, impose parent's, rights parents, decision wear, age 18, wear seat,
Approximate Word count = 579
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)