Limiting Rights
Government is justifiable in limiting the rights of the people it governs for the welfare of the group, and even themselves (the people). If people has use of their absolute rights, meaning they were allowed to do anything because they have the right to do anything they choose, rights of other people would be infringed on. Chaos would be the order without government. People gave the government the power to do this by creating a social contract, an agreement to be governed by a government which in turn will protect the rights of the individuals who created it. In order to protect the natural rights of thepeople, there must be a limit on what people can do (people have the "right" to do anything they want). Even first amendment rights can be taken away if it is necessary. Without the existence of government, man would exist in a state of utter and constant chaos. There would be no order if there was no agreement between a governing body and the people it is set up to govern. Without government, Social Darwinism, or natural selection, would take place, and only the strongest and fittest would survive. Without a social contract, a person would be allowed to do whatever they desired to do. For example, crimes such as
rights of the individual, taking away their use of absolute rights, while making sure their natural rights are fully protected." (Narch, 5). One group cannot created a social contract. Two groups must agree to have a In the United States, citizens have agreed to give up certain rights so long as the government agrees to protect a specific set of natural rights. The Supreme Court, the protector of the Constitution, has ruled that government is allowed to limit rights of individuals guaranteed in the Bill of Rights and in the Constitution. The supreme court states in the case of Schenck vs. the United States in 1919, that the first amendment may be dismissed if there is a "clear and present danger". Thus, the Supreme Court states that the government is allowed to limit rights, and even first amendment rights. Although the In order to keep order, people give up their use of absolute rights for the welfare of the entire group, and in fact to protect themselves from having their rights infringed on. A social contract is the agreement between the government, and the people that it governs. The people agree to give up certain rights (use of absolute rights); the government in turn agrees to protect the natural rights of each and every individual. If everyone had use of their absolute rights, they would be infringing on someone else's rights. For example, if everyone had the use of their absolute rights (no government), they would be able to kill someone else,
Some common words found in the essay are:
Social Darwinism, Supreme Court, , Rights Constitution, rights people, natural rights, absolute rights, social contract, rights government, government people, amendment rights, supreme court, people government, limit rights, rights absolute rights, natural rights people, rights people government, absolute rights infringing, government people government,
Approximate Word count = 1001
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|