Environmental catastrophes such as climate change, flooding, ozone depletion, water pollution, famines, disease, energy crises etc, are all born from the same human induced phenomenon: over population. Stated simply, the more inhabitants of the earth, the greater the need for more of everything.
When we put increasing strain on the resources that sustain us, those resources fail to cope with the burgeoning demand and are at risk of long-term detrimental affects. This in turn manifests in varying forms throughout all facts of our world. Inevitably, injustices arise and our society flounders in a state of chaos. Arguably, this constrains us as a people from achieving our potential and moving our society forward.
The current global ecological crises results primarily from the workings
The fact remains that the destruction of environment and its resources cannot be stemmed unless population growth is stemmed. Population growth rates are still too high to allow adequate protection of our environment.
How do we remedy the situation? Do we continue to rest our hopes on the possibility that technology will save our collective ass, or should we "embody the philosophies of the precautionary principle of substantial development and exercise caution" when planning and making decisions? The former decision reeks of apathy but will probably be favoured arrowing the world as it is basically a do nothing solution. The later option however implies real work and sacrifice, but it is the only option that will bring about the changes that will benefit this and future societies.
All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009
Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA Webmasters make $$$$