Should the US grant China the Most Favored Nation trade status
Should the US grant China the Most Favored Nation Trade Status?Respect for human rights should condition the foreing relation of the US. For this reason, the US government should not grant China the Most Favored Nation trade status. In the following policy memorandum I'll explain the criterion used to make this particular recomendation. According to William Clinton's linkeage policy, human rights violations will be an obstacule for granting China the Most Favored Nation Status. On 28 May 1993, President Clinton's executive order established human rights-related conditioning factors requiring the Secretary of State to recomend to the president by 3 June 1994 a non-continuation of MFN waiver authority for the period beginning 3 July 1994. In the case of human rights conditions "the Secretary of State shall also determine whether China has made overall, significant progress" . It is my recomendation that China should't get this preferntial trade rate because its human rights record has not improved. The goverment of the People's Republic of China is guilty of arbitrary arests, torture, political persecution, repression of tibetan no-vilent protesters, labour camp exports, pro
The method: Our first concern is the structure of the news-delivery system: the laws and administrative decisions and their influence on the content of the news media. Next, we evaluate the degree of political influence or control over the content of the news systems system: the laws and administrative decisions and their influence on the content of the news media. Next, we evaluate the degree of political influence or control over the content of the news systems. Political power, even in the most democratic nations, always seeks to manage the news. Democratic systems, however, create checks and balances to minimize state domination of the news media. Next, we examine the economic influences on news content exerted either by the government or private entrepreneurs. This influence may result from governmental control of newsprint, official advertising, or other financial relationships; or from pressure on media content from market competition in the private sector. The fourth analysis records actual violations against the media, including murder, physical attack, harassment, and censorship. We examine separately the treatment accorded broadcast media and print media. d. Arbitrary Arrest, Detention, or Exile It would be againts the policy President Clinton anounced last year to allow China to get MFN. Besides it would threaten the compromise the US has with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international law. If the US goverment is really concerned about human rights, an economic sanction like taking away the MFN, will be useful for improving China's human rights record. Another argument for granting the MFN status is that we might lose China as a political ally in the UN Security Council. The veto in the Security Council is a threat istrinsic to the structure of this international organization. The Chinese are likely to use this veto even if we grant them the most favored nation status. And even I ,an advoctate for international law, know that the american security decisions do not depend on the veredicts or prefernces of the UN. Veto or no veto the USA is going to take the security measures it considers necesary. Over the years China has had a double standard , arguing on the one hand "for the struggle of third world coutries and other justice upholding countries against the large scale violation of human rights by hegemonism, imperialism, colonialism and autocracy", and on the other that "using alleged charges of human rights violations to vilify and attact China and to interfere with China's judicial and administrative affairs is an act unfriendly to China and Chinese people and the violation of Chinas sovereignity". So China adknowleges human rights violations when they are not committeed in its territory. Finally, according to the Anual Survey of Freedom Country Scores compilated by the respected ONG Freedom House, China is one of the lower socring countries (Apendix A). Press responsibility: This survey does not assess the degree to which the press in any country serves responsibly, reflecting a high ethical standard. The issue of "press responsibility" often is voiced to defend governmental control of the press. A truly irresponsible press does, indeed, diminish its own credibility in the perception of the public, and that is reflected in the degree of freedom in the flow of news and information.
Some common words found in the essay are:
Human Rights, Tibet Daily, Wei Jingsheng, Commerce Department, Freedom House, University Yuanmingyuan, Clinton Congress, World Bank, Treatment Punishment, Republic China, human rights, mfn status, favored nation, loss mfn, human rights violations, rights record, influence religion, persons detained, china favored, negative influence, china favored nation, rights violations, favored nation status, human rights record, article claimed adopt,
Approximate Word count = 3822
Approximate Pages = 15 (250 words per page double spaced)
|