Isn't immoral to punish a person with death penalty if they murder someone? People need to pay for their consequences for what they do. If they borrow things, they need to return it. If they owe other people money, they need to pay it back. Therefore it is very reasonable for a person to pay for their consequenc

Why so crowd? Some prisoners are sending for 100 years in jail. I think it is unnecessary to put someone in jail for this long. We don't even know if they can survive for 100 years and it is a waste of money if they are going to stay in prison all the time. Since the court made a decision to send someone to jail for the rest of their life. What is the point of keeping the person alive while we can use the space for a more appropriated prisoner. Therefore we can send that prisoner who stays in prison for too long to the "electronic seat". Sending them to die first before their time comes to died is good because they can help the society to set example to show other people what a murder consequences are and beside they will died in prison anyway. Those available spaces can help other prisoner who still has chance to get out of jail and started a new life.

If we legislate the Death Penalty we could give more warning to criminals. With the warning can give them an overview of the their consequence

Some common words found in the essay are:
York City, Death Penalty, City Isn't, death penalty, pay consequences, electronic seat, money build, legislate death penalty, prisoners money build, person pay consequences, prisoners money, available spaces, crime rate, build buildings, york city, city government,
Approximate Word count = 679
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)