In contrast, Taylor would argue that any animal or living organism should be protected because that organism is deserving of its own individual worth; the fact that it is protected or endangered would be of little

To summarize the various stages of ethical obligation in Callicott's argument of land ethic, his supporters would argue an "accretion" of his view would be composed of individual beliefs that support the whole rather than the individual. Some examples are given in his work. He argues that an individual cares about the existence of a group to which he or she belongs, therefore that particular individual has a self serving need to protect that group. This protection may include having the same morals as others within that group that collectively comprise the groups whole view and aids in the preservation of its existence. Callicott argues under the Humean-Darwinian approach that individual humans as a whole posses biological sympathies which cause emotion responses related to survival. He uses the example of a lost child to illustrate this. Although, it is not his child who is lost he certainly has some feeling and pity that is awakened within him as a person. In addition he feels sympathy. One could certainly argue that sympathy and pity are emotions that cause an individual to adhere to the norms of group. Adherence to norms inherently causes the self-preservation of the group as a whole.

If the view of the community is to decide whether or not an individual, ecosystem, or environment is to be preserved based upon that above stated val

Some common words found in the essay are:
, Nature Ethic, Land Ethic, Respect Nature, land ethic, land ethic argument, protected endangered, larger accretion, ethic argument, basis larger accretion, respect nature ethic, individual ecosystem environment, basis larger, 'land ethic', ethical obligation, supporters theory, moral force, threatened individual,
Approximate Word count = 915
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)