Walfare
Welfare has been the topic of much controversy over the past few years. Though abolishing welfare altogether is an alternative, welfare reform is more reasonable and feasible. For one, the redistribution of wealth is necessary to maintain equality among the economic classes. The gap between the rich and the poor is widening each day, and welfare aids the redistribution of wealth. Secondly, doing away with welfare altogether would further impoverish those that are currently under its support. There is still a need for welfare, but amendments to its policies would reduce the cost of its upkeep as well as reduce welfare fraud. Such amendments can include a voluntary savings plan to reduce the amount of taxes paid or a limitation on the duration of support. To do away with welfare altogether would increase the poverty level in the U.S. Though proponents of this movement site that many people take advantage of welfare, their argument is only half valid. No one denies that welfare fraud exists, but doing away with welfare altogether would hurt those residents who truly have a need for the support
. Welfare reform can reduce fraud and continue to support families who are truly in need. Doing away with actual "food stamps" has somewhat helped reduce the cost of this program since the new credit-card-like cards have been introduced. But further reform is necessary to make welfare more efficient. One alternative is to limit the duration of support. Though some laws are already in place requiring employment by a deadline, these laws are still not fully enforced. A welfare recipient should meet periodically with a welfare representative to prove that he or she is actively seeking employment. Furthermore, the amount of welfare support should have a phase-out period. For example, if a family is receiving $400 a month in support, within three months the amount should be reduced to $350, then to $300, and so on. The reduction of support with the passage of time encourages recipients to find employment as soon as possible since the support amount will eventually be eliminated. a proportional one, those with a higher incomes pay more taxes. Therefore, richer people are paying for poorer peopl
Some common words found in the essay are:
, welfare altogether, support welfare, doing welfare altogether, poorer people, redistribution wealth, retirement account, doing welfare, welfare representative, duration support, reduce cost, support amount,
Approximate Word count = 745
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
