Walfare
Welfare has been the topic of much controversy over the past few years. Though abolishing welfare altogether is an alternative, welfare reform is more reasonable and feasible. For one, the redistribution of wealth is necessary to maintain equality among the economic classes. The gap between the rich and the poor is widening each day, and welfare aids the redistribution of wealth. Secondly, doing away with welfare altogether would further impoverish those that are currently under its support. There is still a need for welfare, but amendments to its policies would reduce the cost of its upkeep as well as reduce welfare fraud. Such amendments can include a voluntary savings plan to reduce the amount of taxes paid or a limitation on the duration of support. To do away with welfare altogether would increase the poverty level in the U.S. Though proponents of this movement site that many people take advantage of welfare, their argument is only half valid. No one denies that welfare fraud exists, but doing away with welfare altogether would hurt those residents who truly have a need for the support
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
, welfare altogether, support welfare, doing welfare altogether, poorer people, redistribution wealth, retirement account, doing welfare, welfare representative, duration support, reduce cost, support amount,
Approximate Word count = 745
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
