The Truth About Social Security
In 1935 President Franklin Roosevelt proposed his social security measures. In his annual message he declared that the day of great private fortunes was ended and instead, wealth must be better distributed. Every citizen must be guaranteed "a proper security, a reasonable leisure, and a decent living throughout life."1 The depression had lessened, but it was not over yet as unemployment and poverty were still widespread. The Social Security Act was signed August 1935. Under the Act, Social Security provided for three main programs. 1. A retirement annuity. It works like an annuity in that the beneficiary receives a fixed monthly payment and the total received depends on how long the beneficiary lives. 2. A spousal and survivors benefit. Benefits are available for dependents and survivors of an insured worker. 3. Disability insurance. Social Security provides earnings-related pension benefits to workers who are disabled below the normal retirement age, and to their dependents. A cursory look at Social Security would lead one to believe that America is a better place with these three main programs in place. In the nearly 65 years since President Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act, America has considerably cha
· The Social Security payroll tax rate has climbed from 2 percent to 12.4 percent over the past 50 years. Other privatization success stories have been documented in Britain and Singapore with numerous other countries moving in the same direction. With these success stories in place, it would seem obvious that privatization would be an obvious answer shared by all. Not the case; one source say's "...private accounts shift risk onto individual and create a system where the highest income people will have less and less support for the system. In the short run it may be in their best interest but not society's...privatization undermines the idea of the social system and the retirement system and ultimately you lose the idea of protection."8 Under Chile's private system, new workers are required to deposit 10 percent of their income in pension funds of their choice; currently, they have more than 20 options. "More than 90 percent of Chile's older workers who could have chosen to participate in the government-run Social Security scheme chose the private options instead. Those who participate over their working years will be able to retire with an average annual income worth 70 percent of their pre-retirement income--more than three times the amount promised under the old system."6 The Social Security taxes are too high and, without reform, could rise much higher. The payroll taxes used to fund Social Security have exploded in recent decades. Both the tax rate and the amount of income subject to the tax have increased dramatically. "One result is that payroll taxes are now a heavier burden than income taxes for about 75 percent of taxpayers. Specifically: Research has proven there is no simple answer on how to reform Social Security but it does appear to be divided among liberal and conservative philosophies of either leaving the "Social" in Social Security or full/partial privatization of the system.
Some common words found in the essay are:
Social Security, Franklin Roosevelt, Security Old-Age, Britain Singapore, US$30000 Workers, social security, Social Security-type, Social Security's, Old-Age Survivors, Superannuation Guarantees, Americans URL, rate return, payroll taxes, payroll tax, australian government, percent income, citizen guaranteed proper, president franklin, tax contributions, main programs, retirement income, proper security reasonable, real rate return, security reasonable leisure, security payroll tax,
Approximate Word count = 1452
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|