Will the Internet Save Democra
Americans are adamant about democracy. Though many people complain of the troubles with politics, they would never dream of doing away with democracy itself. It is the center point of our entire country. Despite the apparent importance of it, relatively few people actually participate in government. People either feel that the government is to distance to affect or they simply don't know much about it. Both of these scenarios create a cynical population. The Washington post published an opinion poll in 1996 that came to the conclusion that "Americans who knew the least about government were the most likely to be mistrustful and cynical toward it" (Can Technology Save Democracy?). Similarly, cynicism and mistrust can come "from [the government's] complex bureaucracy, inaccessibility, and unresponsiveness to the electorate" (How to Use -and Not Use- Digital Democracy). Our democracy now, is ruled by a group of people who actually participate, forming an almost elitist form of democracy. Will the Information Age change attitudes towards politics? The Internet can potentially have an enormous effect on politics and democracy. It is up to the public, however, to harness this power.
The media has been proposed to solve the problems of democracy before. With each new technological advance, people cling to the idea that it will create a new kind of active and informed individual. With the introduction of radio, political news could suddenly be transmitted at a much faster rate than ever before. Franklin Roosevelt's fireside chats are a prime example of the hope and faith poured into the medium. But did the radio solve the problem of ignorance among the American public? It is hard to say since the time period that radio was becoming popular coincided with a very turbulent time in American history. By 1935, over half of American homes had radios (Government and Politics on the Net Project). In 1936, voter turnout reached 61% of the eligible voting population, but this is not necessarily the consequence of more communication (History of Presidential Elections). Roosevelt had just begun to pull America up by its bootstraps and the people loved it. Although the voter turnout figure is relatively high for our history, it is still much too low to be a miracle worked by the technology of the time. Again, when television came out and it became an integral part of transmitting the news, people had high expectations of it. Information could be communicated much more efficiently. Images could accompany the stories. The information also flowed both ways much easier. The public could view the government's actions and politicians could see the consequences of those actions on the people. But this did not bring about any new and improved democracy either. In fact, some people would argue that the media have bred even more distrust of the government by publicizing every move or mistake. Thus far the media have only brought information to the people and not improved democracy much. The spreading of information, however, is a place to start. History of American Presidential Elections. MultiEducator, Inc. 12 Apr. 2000 < http://www.multied
Some common words found in the essay are:
Information Age, Elections Roosevelt, Technology Democracy, Democracy Americans, Unfortunately Internet, Digital Democracy, Franklin Roosevelt's, Law School, Net Project, Journal Vol, apr 2000, 2000 <, apr 2000 <, democracy people, digital democracy, save democracy, creating democratic society, participate government, voting population, government people, people actually, actually participate, 11 apr 2000, technology save democracy, 10 apr 2000,
Approximate Word count = 1329
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
