The Ontological Argument is the argument that God does exist. This concept is derived from reason and logic, not of knowledge of the world (Ontological). This argument takes an analytical approach to prove the existence of God. It uses defined words and definite descriptions to infer upon the existence of God (Ontological).

The Ontological Argumentative viewpoint for the existence of God is based upon inferences from abstract and necessary ideas from the human mind (Strong). Within the Ontological Argument there are three major forms: the form of Samuel Clarke, Rene` Descartes, and that of Saint Anselm. Clarke states that there has to be an existence of a god because space and time have always existed, thus they are infinite, therefore there must be an infinite creator.

Decartes' view is slightly different. He reasons that human beings have this idea of infinite and perfect ideas, yet humans are finite and imperfect. This causes Descartes to reason that there must be a god that has placed these ideas within us. The third form is that of Saint Anselm. He declares, "that than which none greater can be conceived," meaning that if nothing greater can be thought of or imagined then there must be God (Velasquez).

The Ontological Argument is often called the a priori argument, which is knowledge based upon the idea that a thought is reasoned and logically known before any experience is obtained (Velasquez). The reason for it being called a priori is because of its logical thought process that it takes to understand the Ontological Argument.

flawed and limited, therefore only a God could place an infinite thought into our mind (Strong).

The overall view of the Ontological Argument is accurate and precise. The Ontological Argument does not use practice and experience as the foundation. It is a complete realization by the fact that it is not based on knowledge from the world, but is based on sound reasoning and logic.

because the statement that God exists only in understanding proves God is not the greatest, thus the statement is not true. Signifying that God's existence only in understanding is wrong because God does exist in both reality and understanding ("Saint"). To conclude, Anselm says that God does exist.

understanding. He proceeds to explain this idea by saying that God exists only in understanding, therefore God can be conceived, yet it does not prove His existence. Furtherm

Some common words found in the essay are:
Ontological Argument, Anselm Anselm's, Descartes God's, Anselm Clarke, Due God, Furthermore God, God Supreme, Strong Foremost, ontological argument, , Signifying God's, existence god, god exists, god exists understanding, exists understanding, god exist, premises conclusion, argument god, prove existence, version ontological, saint anselm, version ontological argument, ontological argument comes, prove existence god, anselm's argument god,
Approximate Word count = 1113
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)